Racism at work shows up in who gets called for an interview, who gets promoted and who gets paid more. In the second quarter of 2026, Black full-time workers in the United States had median weekly earnings of $1,029, and white workers earned $1,268 (Bureau of Labor Statistics). That puts Black workers at about 81 cents for every dollar white workers earn. Black women earned $991 a week, about 71 percent of the $1,400 white men earned (BLS). In August 2026, the Black unemployment rate was 6.0 percent, compared with 3.7 percent for white workers (BLS).
Much of this gap starts before anyone is hired. In a study published in 2004, economists Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan sent identical résumés to employers in Boston and Chicago. Résumés with white-sounding names got 50 percent more callbacks than those with Black-sounding names (National Bureau of Economic Research). A 2021 follow-up by Patrick Kline, Evan Rose and Christopher Walters sent more than 83,000 applications to over 100 Fortune 500 companies. The companies with the worst grades favored white applicants by 24 percent (Becker Friedman Institute). Employers often blame a small “pipeline” of qualified Black candidates, but these studies compared applicants with the same qualifications. Bias also enters through performance reviews, informal sponsorship and pay decisions that no one checks.
Federal policy changed quickly in 2025. On Jan. 21, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14173, which revoked Executive Order 11246 (Federal Register). Since 1965, that order had required federal contractors to keep affirmative action plans. The Labor Department estimated it covered about 107,000 supply and service establishments and about 10,000 construction contractors (Federal Register). On March 19, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Justice Department said employee resource groups, mentoring and training can’t be limited by race (Littler). On April 23, 2025, Executive Order 14281 told agencies to stop prioritizing “disparate impact” cases, a legal theory the Supreme Court first recognized in 1971 (Woods Rogers). On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services that majority-group workers face the same standard of proof as anyone else under Title VII (Supreme Court). The EEOC regained a quorum on Oct. 7, 2025 (Holland & Knight). Its guidance says race can’t be even one motivating factor in a job decision, and it tells workers who believe a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) program harmed them to file a charge (EEOC). In January 2026, the commission voted to require its approval before the agency files any new lawsuit (Morgan Lewis).
Companies have responded mostly by changing their language. The Conference Board found that use of the term “DEI” in S&P 500 annual filings fell 68 percent from 2024 to 2025. The share of those companies tying executive pay to DEI goals fell from 68 percent to 35 percent, and board oversight of DEI rose to 79 percent (The Conference Board). Meta ended its DEI team in January 2025 (Ongig). Target ended its REACH racial equity program on Jan. 24, 2025 (Yahoo News). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 still applies. It bars employers with 15 or more workers from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and it bars retaliation against anyone who complains or helps an investigation (EEOC). Private workers can still bring disparate impact claims in court (Woods Rogers).